Arora et al v. Daniels et al

Filing 46

ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice as to Defendants Brown and Coyle. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/06/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ctb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:17-cv-134 NARESH C. ARORA, SUDHA ARORA Plaintiffs, v. REUBEN DANIELS, JR., et. al, Defendants. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own motion. Pursuant to the Court’s Order on April 2, 2018, Plaintiffs’ prior service of process on Defendants Coyle and Brown was quashed. (Doc. No. 41). Plaintiffs were instructed that they had sixty (60) days to properly serve Defendants Brown and Coyle or the Court would dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims against Brown and Coyle. Plaintiffs declined to properly serve Defendants Brown and Coyle, and, on August 24, 2018, the Court ordered Plaintiffs “to show cause within 14 days why the claims against [Defendants] Brown and Coyle should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” (Doc. No. 43). Plaintiffs declined to respond. Thus, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Brown and Coyle are DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed: December 6, 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?