Arora et al v. Daniels et al
Filing
46
ORDER dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice as to Defendants Brown and Coyle. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/06/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ctb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:17-cv-134
NARESH C. ARORA,
SUDHA ARORA
Plaintiffs,
v.
REUBEN DANIELS, JR., et. al,
Defendants.
____________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own motion. Pursuant to the Court’s Order
on April 2, 2018, Plaintiffs’ prior service of process on Defendants Coyle and Brown was quashed.
(Doc. No. 41). Plaintiffs were instructed that they had sixty (60) days to properly serve Defendants
Brown and Coyle or the Court would dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims against Brown and Coyle. Plaintiffs
declined to properly serve Defendants Brown and Coyle, and, on August 24, 2018, the Court
ordered Plaintiffs “to show cause within 14 days why the claims against [Defendants] Brown and
Coyle should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.” (Doc. No. 43). Plaintiffs declined to respond. Thus, Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendants Brown and Coyle are DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 6, 2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?