Clayton v. Kia Motor Finance
Filing
4
ORDER that the Plaintiffs complaint for temporary restraining order without notice is DENIED; Further Ordered that this is immediately converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and the Plaintiff is required to serve notice on the Defendant Kia Motor Finance. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 05/08/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bar) (Main Document 4 replaced on 5/8/2017) (bar). Modified text on 5/8/2017 (bar).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00244-GCM
WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON.,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIA MOTOR FINANCE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiff’s complaint for temporary restraining
order without notice. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff failed to certify in writing any efforts made to give
notice and the reasons why it should not be required pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
65(b) guiding temporary restraining orders without notice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s complaint for temporary restraining
order without notice is DENIED. This is immediately converted into a motion for preliminary
injunction and the Plaintiff is required to serve notice on the Defendant Kia Motor Finance.
Signed: May 8, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?