Clayton v. Kia Motor Finance

Filing 4

ORDER that the Plaintiffs complaint for temporary restraining order without notice is DENIED; Further Ordered that this is immediately converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and the Plaintiff is required to serve notice on the Defendant Kia Motor Finance. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 05/08/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(bar) (Main Document 4 replaced on 5/8/2017) (bar). Modified text on 5/8/2017 (bar).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00244-GCM WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON., Plaintiff, v. KIA MOTOR FINANCE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiff’s complaint for temporary restraining order without notice. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff failed to certify in writing any efforts made to give notice and the reasons why it should not be required pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) guiding temporary restraining orders without notice. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s complaint for temporary restraining order without notice is DENIED. This is immediately converted into a motion for preliminary injunction and the Plaintiff is required to serve notice on the Defendant Kia Motor Finance. Signed: May 8, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?