Howard v. McFarland et al

Filing 7

ORDER granting 4 Motion to Dismiss and the Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 6/23/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(eef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00248-GCM WARREN HOWARD, Plaintiffs, v. MELISSA MCFARLAND CHRIS MCFARLAND JOSH CRUMPLER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) and Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 5). The pro se Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants on May 9, 2017. The Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on May 15, 2017. On June 8, 2017 the Court sent a Roseboro Order to the Plaintiff, setting a response deadline of June 22, 2017. The Plaintiff failed to respond. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that for good cause shown the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss hereby GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed: June 23, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?