Podesta, et al v. Hanzel, et al
Filing
22
ORDER administratively denying as moot without prejudice 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/19/17. (tob)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00266-RJC-DSC
JEFFREY PODESTA AND STREET
SEARCH, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN F. HANZEL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Defendant Jayson Colavalla’s Motion to
Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process and Failure to State a Claim” (document # 10) filed
August 21, 2017. The Court granted Plaintiff an additional ten days to respond to the Motion to
Dismiss in an Order dated August 30, 2017 (document #18). On September 12, 2017, Plaintiff
filed a First Amended Civil Action Complaint (document #20) as a matter of right pursuant to Rule
15(a)(1)(B). On September 19, 2017, Plaintiff filed “Plaintiffs’ Notice of Dismissal, Without
Prejudice, as to All Defendants Other Than John F. Hanzel and John F. Hanzel, P.A. Attorneys at
Law” (document #21).
Rule 15(a)(1) grants a party the right to “amend its pleading once as a matter of course,” if
done within twenty-one (21) days after serving the pleading, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or, “if
the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required,” a party may amend once as a matter
of course, provided that it does so within “21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days
after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(1)(B). It is well settled that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that
motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. Young v. City of Mount Ranier,
238 F. 3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (amended pleading renders original pleading of no effect);
Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motion to dismiss
original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).
For the above reasons, the Court orders that “Defendant Jayson Colavalla’s Motion to
Dismiss…” (document #10), be administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice and further
notes that pursuant to Defendants’ September 19, 2017 Notice (document #21) Defendant Jayson
Colavalla has been dismissed without prejudice from this action.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties, including but
not limited to moving counsel; and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr..
SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 19, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?