Baucom v. Berryhill
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 11/16/2018. (brl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:17 CV 327
ALISON BAUCOM,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
_______________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Payment of Attorney
Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 26). The parties have agreed that Plaintiff should
be awarded $3,350.00 in attorney’s fees. (Doc. 26-1 at 2).
After review and consideration of the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion
should be allowed.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1)
Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Payment of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access
to Justice Act (Doc. 26) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in
the amount of $3,350.00 (“Fee Award”).
(2)
As EAJA fees belong to the litigant and are subject to offset under the Treasury
Offset Program, see Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the Fee Award shall be
paid by Defendant as follows:
a. If Plaintiff has federal debt registered with the Department of Treasury that may
be offset by the Fee Award, such amount of the Fee Award as is necessary to
satisfy Plaintiff’s federal debt shall be so used, up to and including the entire
amount of the Fee Award.
b. The remaining balance of the Fee Award after application of the offset, if any,
described above shall be delivered by Defendant to Plaintiff’s counsel on behalf
of Plaintiff.
Signed: November 16, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?