James v. Tankamnerd

Filing 12

ORDER after review of Plaintiffs letter (Doc. No. 10)the Court finds it does not state a viable complaint or set forth reasonable grounds for inquiry. Should Plaintiff intend to file a Complaint under Rule 6 of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, Plaintiff should contact the Clerk of Court for the appropriate form.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/31/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:17-cv-00334-MOC-DSC
JOANN JAMES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RONALD TANKAMNERD,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court by order of referral from the Honorable Max O.
Cogburn, Jr., requesting the undersigned, as Chief Judge, review a letter from Plaintiff to the Court
(Doc. No. 10) under Rule 5 of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings.
(See Doc. No. 11). The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s letter and finds it does not state a viable
complaint or set forth reasonable grounds for inquiry. Should Plaintiff intend to file a Complaint
under Rule 6 of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings, Plaintiff
should contact the Clerk of Court for the appropriate form.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: October 31, 2017

1