Flores v. Alvarado et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 12/19/2017. (chh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:17-cv-514-RJC-DSC RAFAEL ANTONIO GARCIA FLORES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) YOSELIN YESSENIA MORALES ) ALVARADO, CARMEN LUCIDNA ) ALVARDO, and DAVID ALVARDO ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Rafael Antonio Garcia Flores’ (“Plaintiff’s”) Motion for Entry of Default, (Doc. No. 4). On August 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed before this Court an action petitioning the return of his son, a minor child, to El Salvador. (Doc. No. 1). After issuing summons, (Doc. No. 2), and filing an affidavit of service, (Doc. No. 3), Plaintiff then filed a Motion for Entry of Default against all three defendants, (Doc. No. 4). Soon after, defendant Yoselin Alvarado filed a Motion for Extension of Time, (Doc. No. 5), which Magistrate Judge Cayer granted, (Doc. No. 7). Upon review of the docket, defendant Yoselin Alvarado has continued to actively take part in the current litigation. Since Judge Cayer’s order granting an extension of time, Yoselin Alvarado has filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to state a Claim, (Doc. No. 8), which Plaintiff has responded to, (Doc. No. 9). As such, Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default is DENIED as applied to Yoselin Alvarado but GRANTED as applied to defendants Carmen Lucidna Alvarado and David Alvarado. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default, (Doc. No. 4), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed: December 19, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?