Singleton v. Berryhill
Filing
28
ORDER granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/10/2019. (mek)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:17-cv-552-FDW-DSC
WILLIE SINGLETON,
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
ANDREW SAUL,
COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
DEFENDANT.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Attorney’s Fees filed by Plaintiff’s
counsel, George C Piemonte, on August 25, 2019.
Document #25. The Defendant “neither
supports nor opposes counsel’s request.” Document #27 at 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b),
whenever the Court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant, it may award attorney fees not to
exceed twenty-five per cent of past-due benefits.
In the instant case, the fee agreement between the Plaintiff and counsel provides for a
contingency fee of twenty-five per cent of past-due benefits. In these circumstances, the reviewing
court does not calculate a lodestar amount. It simply reviews the fee claimed for reasonableness.
See Mudd v. Barnhardt, 418 F.3d 424, 427-28 (4th Cir. 2005).
The Court has reviewed the amount requested by counsel and finds it to be reasonable.
Accordingly, counsel’s Motion is ALLOWED. Plaintiff was awarded $106,020.00 in past-due
benefits at the administrative level after this Court entered judgment. The Social Security
Administration shall release the sum of $8,919.12 to plaintiff’s counsel as attorney’s fees for
services rendered before this Court. Plaintiff’s counsel shall refund to the Plaintiff the amount of
$5,700.00 previously awarded and paid to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 10, 2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?