Kinsinger et al v. Smartcore, LLC et al

Filing 194

ORDER denying as moot 184 Motion to Forbid Transfer of Non-Exempt Property; denying as moot 188 Motion to Enforce Judgment; denying as moot 189 Motion to Enforce Judgment; denying as moot 190 Motion to Enforce Judgment. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/21/21. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
NO. 3:17-CV-00643-FDW-DCK
ERIC KINSINGER and DENISE
KINSINGER,
Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

SMARTCORE, LLC, et. al.
Defendants.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on several pending motions filed by Plaintiffs seeking
the Court’s assistance in enforcing the judgment entered in this case (Doc. No. 184, 188, 189, 190).
Following the filing of these motions, Plaintiff filed a Satisfaction of Judgment (Doc. No. 192),
which Defendant Winn contends moots all pending motions related to Plaintiff’s enforcement of
the judgment (Doc. No. 193 (citations omitted)). The Court agrees, and these motions shall be
denied as moot. Notably, Plaintiffs’ Satisfaction of Judgment indicates it is filed “without
prejudice to Plaintiffs’ pending motion for attorney fees.” (Doc. No. 192 (emphasis added)). The
Court has already ruled on Plaintiffs’ motions for attorney’s fees (Doc. Nos. 128, 145), and no
other motion regarding attorney’s fees remains “pending” on the Court’s docket.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the pending motions (Doc. No. 184, 188, 189, 190)
are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 21, 2021