Snyder's-Lance, Inc. et al v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.

Filing 65

ORDER granting 53 Motion to Compel Production of No.7. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/26/19. (tob)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No: 3:17-CV-00652-RJC-DSC SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC. and PRINCETON VANGUARD, LLC, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s “Motion to Compel Production of Documents” (document #53) and the parties’ briefs and exhibits. In its Reply brief, Defendant states that the parties have reached agreement regarding Requests for Production Nos. 15 and 16. The only unresolved issue is whether Plaintiffs must respond to Request for Production No. 7. Defendant seeks production of communications arising after the close of discovery in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings where Plaintiffs’ own consumers use “pretzel crisps” and related terms in lower case letters. For the reasons stated in Defendant’s briefs, the Court concludes that Defendant is entitled to complete responses to Request for Production No. 7. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s “Motion to Compel Production of Documents” (document #53) is GRANTED as to Request for Production No. 7. Within fifteen days of this Order, Plaintiffs shall produce all documents responsive to Request for Production No. 7. in the format as they are kept in the ordinary course of business, along with accompanying 1 metadata. Plaintiffs shall identify all responsive documents that were not retained during the course of litigation. 2. The parties shall bear their own costs at this time. 3. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties’ counsel and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr. SO ORDERED. Signed: March 26, 2019 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?