Sanders v. Caledonia Corrections et al
Filing
4
ORDER Plaintiffs action is transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/28/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:17-cv-679-FDW
JACKIE SANDERS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CALEDONIA CORRECTIONS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on initial review of Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Doc. No.
1).
I.
BACKGROUND
In this action filed on November 22, 2017, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pro se Plaintiff
Jackie Sanders, a North Carolina inmate currently incarcerated at Craven Correctional Institution
in Vanceboro, North Carolina, purports to bring a claim for deliberate indifference to serious
medical needs arising out of events occurring while he was an inmate at Caledonia Correctional
Institution in Halifax, North Carolina. Plaintiff has named as Defendants (1) “Caledonia
Corrections”; (2) the “State of North Carolina”; and (3) “FNU Long,” identified as a doctor at
Central Prison in Raleigh, North Carolina. Plaintiff alleges in relevant part that, when he was
incarcerated at Caledonia, medical staff sent him to Central Prison, where Dr. Long removed a
mole without Plaintiff’s consent.
II.
DISCUSSION
In an action arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, venue is established by 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b),
1
which provides: (b) A civil action may be brought in: (1) a judicial district where any defendant
resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial
district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or
a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no
district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial
district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such
action. Therefore, under Section 1391, Plaintiff’s action may be heard in a venue where all the
defendants reside, or in the venue where the issue substantially arose, which is the Eastern
District of North Carolina. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the Court may dismiss this action,
or, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer this action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina. The Court will transfer this action to the Eastern District of
North Carolina.
III.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated herein, the Court transfers this action to the Eastern District of
North Carolina.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s action is transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina.
2. The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action.
Signed: November 28, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?