Edwards v. Behr Process Corporation et al
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING MDL TRANSFER. Signed by Sarah S. Vance, Chair, Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (tmg)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2804
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 5)
On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 160 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge
Polster.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Jan 24, 2018
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
I hereby certify that this instrument is a
true and correct copy of the original on
file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich,
Clerk U.S. District Court
Northern District of Ohio
By: /s/Robert Pitts
Deputy Clerk
IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
LITIGATION
SCHEDULE CTO 5
DIST
DIV.
MDL No. 2804
TAG ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
17 00831
Association of Arkansas Counties et al v. Purdue
Pharma Inc et al
Board of Commissioners of The County of Allen The v.
Purdue Pharma LP et al
Fort Wayne City of v. Cardinal Health Inc et al
ARKANSAS EASTERN
ARE
4
INDIANA NORTHERN
INN
1
18 00003
INN
1
18 00005
INDIANA SOUTHERN
INS
1
18 00047
INS
1
18 00048
INS
1
18 00054
INS
1
18 00057
INS
1
18 00060
INS
2
18 00010
INS
2
18 00011
INS
4
18 00003
INS
4
18 00006
IOWA SOUTHERN
CITY OF GREENWOOD, INDIANA v.
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et
al
CITY OF NOBLESVILLE, INDIANA v.
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et
al
TOWN OF ATLANTA, INDIANA v. CARDINAL
HEALTH, INC. et al
CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA v. CARDINAL
HEALTH, INC., et al
CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA v.
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et
al
VIGO COUNTY INDIANA v.
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et
al
CITY OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA v. CARDINAL
HEALTH, INC. et al
HARRISON COUNTY, INDIANA v. CARDINAL
HEALTH, INC. et al
JENNINGS COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et
al
IAS
IAS
4
4
18 00010
18 00011
Polk County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
Adair County et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
17 00193
Pike v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al Opposed 1/24/18
2
18 00002
Woods v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
1
18 00063
Cecil County, Maryland v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
Hapgood v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
City of Woburn v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
City of Methuen v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
KENTUCKY EASTERN
KYE
7
LOUISIANA WESTERN
LAW
MARYLAND
MD
MASSACHUSETTS
MA
1
18 10010
MA
3
18 10032
MA
3
18 10035
MICHIGAN EASTERN
MIE
1
18 10078
MIE
5
18 10077
County of Roscommon, Michigan v. Purdue Pharma
L.P. et al
County of Crawford, Michigan v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et
al
1
1
1
2
18
18
18
18
Leelanau, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Mason, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Manistee, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Marquette, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
0
18 00062
MICHIGAN WESTERN
MIW
MIW
MIW
MIW
00030
00032
00033
00001
MINNESOTA
MN
County of Anoka, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et
al
MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN
MSN
3
18 00006
MSN
3
18 00007
MSN
3
18 00008
MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN
Tippah County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
Benton County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
Union County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
MSS
5
18 00009
Amite County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
NEW YORK NORTHERN
NYN
1
18 00024
County of Albany, New York v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et
al
NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN
NCE
7
18 00001
NCE
7
18 00002
Onslow County v. AmerisourceBergen Drug
Corporation et al
City of Jacksonville v. AmerisourceBergen Drug
Corporation et al
NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN
NCW
1
18 00004
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v.
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
18 04003
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe et al v. Purdue Pharma
L.P. et al
SOUTH DAKOTA
SD
4
TENNESSEE EASTERN
TNE
2
18 00002
TNE
2
18 00003
TNE
3
18 00006
Greene County, Tennessee v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
Johnson County v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al (TV1)
Campbell County v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al (JRG2)
18 00008
Williamson County, Tennessee v. AmerisourceBergen
Drug Corporation et al
18 02016
Haywood County v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Coropration et al
18 00002
18 00002
County of Camp v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
County of Franklin v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
TENNESSEE MIDDLE
TNM
3
TENNESSEE WESTERN
TNW
1
TEXAS EASTERN
TXE
TXE
2
5
WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN
WVS
5
17 04484
Raleigh County Commission v. CVS Indiana, L.L.C. et
al
WISCONSIN EASTERN
WIE
2
18 00022
Brown County et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?