Axis Surplus Insurance Company v. Buckeye Fire Equipment Company

Filing 52

ORDER setting Final Pretrial Conference, ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/4/2021 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2-1, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Frank D. Whitney.). Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/16/20. (clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:18-cv-79-FDW-DCK AXIS SURPLUS COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. BUCKEYE COMPANY, FIRE Defendant. INSURANCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) EQUIPMENT ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF HEARING and ORDER TAKE NOTICE that a pretrial conference will take place immediately following docket call on Monday, January 4, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #2-1 of the Charles R. Jonas Federal Building, 401 W. Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28202. The parties’ joint pretrial submissions required below shall be due Friday, December 11, 2020. PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES a. Trial. This case shall be tried with a jury. b. Final Pretrial Conference. The Court has noticed final pretrial conference herein. On or before the date of the final pretrial conference, counsel shall seriously revisit the possibility of settlement and be prepared at conference to inform the Court of the parties’ efforts. c. Pretrial Submissions. The Court requires the following pretrial submissions to be jointly drafted and submitted to Chambers by December 11, 2020: i. Jointly-Proposed Pretrial Order. This jointly-prepared and jointly- submitted document shall contain: Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 7 (1) A joint statement of the case, the purpose of which is to acquaint the jury with the nature of the case. Unless the case is extremely complex, this statement should not ordinarily exceed one page. (2) Stipulations as to all issues of law or fact to which the parties can agree for purposes of streamlining trial. If a party fails to stipulate to a fact (e.g., the authenticity of a document) without articulating a good faith basis for disputing it, the Court shall assess against that party the opposing party’s costs (including the cost of subpoena service, witness travel costs and fees, and reasonable attorney’s fees) incurred in proving the fact at trial. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(2). (3) A brief synopsis (no argument) of the legal or factual contentions about which the parties have been unable to stipulate. Any advocacy should be reserved for a trial brief which may be submitted as provided in Paragraph 4(d) below. (4) A list of exhibits that each party may offer at trial (except those offered solely for impeachment or cross-examination), numbered sequentially; a brief description of the exhibit; any stipulations as to authenticity or admissibility; and the basis for any objections. This information shall be entered into a table in substantially the following format (the last two columns should be left blank to be completed by the courtroom clerk at trial): Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 7 Exh. No. Description Stipulation – Authenticity Stipulation – Admissibility Objections 1 Police Report Yes No Hearsay 2 Draft of Contract No No Identified By Foundation, Relevance, Admitted Parol Evidence (5) Designations by volume, page and line of all portions of pleadings and discovery materials, including depositions, interrogatories, and requests for admission, that each party may offer at trial (except those offered solely for impeachment or cross-examination); crossdesignations; a brief description of the substance of the designation; and the basis for any objections. This information should be entered into a similar table format as the exhibit list. (6) A list of the names and addresses of all witnesses each party may offer at trial, together with a brief statement of what counsel proposes to establish by their testimony. (7) A statement of the qualifications of any expert witness a party may offer at trial, unless the parties have stipulated to the qualifications of the expert witness as provided above. ii. Jointly-Proposed Voir Dire. The general procedures governing voir dire are set forth in the Court’s Standing Order Governing Jury Selection and Instruction in Civil Cases Before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney, Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 3 of 7 Miscellaneous No. 3:07-MC-47 (Doc. No. 5). In addition to the Court’s standard voir dire, counsel may prepare and jointly submit a single compilation of voir dire questions sought to be asked, also noting the agreement or objection of other parties to each proposed question. Pursuant to Rule 47(a), the Court will ask prospective jurors only such of the proposed voir dire as it deems proper. iii. Jointly-Proposed Jury Instructions. The general procedures governing jury instruction are set forth in the Court’s Standing Order Governing Jury Selection and Instruction in Civil Cases Before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney, Miscellaneous No. 3:07-MC-47 (Doc. No. 5). Any objections to, or requests for modification or supplementation of, the Court’s pattern jury instructions must be made at this time or may be deemed waived. In addition to the Court’s generally-applicable pattern jury instructions, counsel should prepare and jointly submit a single compilation of proposed jury instructions that are narrowly tailored to the anticipated issues arising at trial (e.g., the elements of the claims and defenses at issue), subject to supplementation at the close of evidence, as necessary, as contemplated by Rule 51. Counsel shall identify and index each proposed instruction by number and heading and support each proposed instruction with adequate legal authority. Where there is disagreement as to any instruction, this jointly prepared submission shall disclose the basis for a party’s objection and (if applicable) provide a proposed alternate instruction. iv. Exhibits. In order to facilitate publishing exhibits electronically through the Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 4 of 7 multimedia technology available in the courtroom, counsel shall submit to Chambers a flash drive containing the pertinent files (in JPEG or PDF format for documents and images and MPEG format for audio/video), named according to the corresponding exhibit number assigned to the exhibit in the proposed pretrial order. These flash drives are to be courtesy copies for the Court’s personal use at trial. Counsel should be aware that each party will bear sole responsibility for maintaining the actual exhibits offered by that party and admitted at trial. All working drafts of documents (e.g., the proposed pretrial order) shall be submitted to Chambers electronically, in either WordPerfect (WPD) or Rich Text (RTF) format, utilizing the CyberClerk feature of CM/ECF. d. Motions In Limine and Trial Briefs. To the extent that contested issues of law and evidentiary objections can be anticipated in advance of trial, trial briefs and/or motions in limine, if appropriate, shall be filed on the Monday prior to the first day of the trial term during which the case has been calendared. Written responses shall be due on the Thursday prior to the first day of the trial term. Word limits for motions in limine shall be governed by Paragraph 3(c)(i) and word limits for trial briefs shall be governed by Paragraph 3(c)(ii). e. Video Depositions. If video depositions are taken and counsel intend to use them at trial, counsel are directed to resolve any objections and edit the video accordingly so that the video may be shown without interruption. Failure to do this prior to trial will result in objections being deemed to be waived. f. De Bene Esse Depositions. De bene esse trial depositions may not be taken outside Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 5 of 7 of the discovery period without consent of all parties or leave of court upon a showing: (i) that the deponent will be unavailable at trial for one of the reasons set forth in Rule 32(a)(3) and, if the reason for unavailability is that the witness resides outside of the Court’s subpoena power, that the party desiring the testimony has first made a good faith effort to obtain the voluntary attendance of the witness at trial; (ii) that the witness had not previously been deposed in a discovery deposition, or that exigent facts exist that would justify reopening the deposition; (iii) that the deposition can be scheduled at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the first day of the trial term during which the case has been calendared; and (iv) that no substantial and irremediable prejudice will result to an adverse party on account of the taking of the deposition. g. Trial Subpoenas. Counsel must subpoena all witnesses at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the first day of the trial term during which the case has been calendared. The Court may elect not to enforce subpoenas that have not been issued in compliance with this deadline or, if requested, may quash subpoenas that have not been issued in compliance with this deadline. h. Assessment of Jury Costs. Whenever a civil action scheduled for a jury trial is settled or otherwise disposed of in advance of the actual trial, the Court may assess all jurors’ costs (including Marshal’s fees, mileage reimbursement, and per diem fees) equally against the parties or otherwise may determine appropriate assessments, unless the Clerk’s office is notified at least one (1) full business day prior to the date on which the action is scheduled for trial or the parties establish good cause why the Court should not assess jury costs against them. When any Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 6 of 7 civil trial is settled at trial in advance of a verdict, the Court likewise may make the same assessments unless the parties establish good cause why the Court should not do so. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: November 16, 2020 Case 3:18-cv-00079-FDW-DCK Document 52 Filed 11/16/20 Page 7 of 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?