Corbett v. Perry et al
Filing
62
ORDER granting 60 access to 24 Summons Returned Executed. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 9/16/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ams)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:18-cv-103-MOC
STANLEY CORBETT, JR.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FRANK PERTY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Gregory Haynes’ Motion Requesting
Access to Sealed Summons, (Doc. No. 60).
Pro se incarcerated Plaintiff filed this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. The
Complaint passed initial review on claims against several individuals including Defendant Haynes.
(Doc. Nos. 1, 9). The executed summons for Defendant Haynes was filed under seal pursuant to
this Court’s Local Rules because the pro se Plaintiff is incarcerated. See LCvR 4.3(c); (Doc. Nos.
15, 24). Counsel for Defendant Haynes now seeks permission to view the sealed summons form
to determine whether service was defective. (Doc. No. 60).
The Motion will be granted and the Clerk of Court will be directed to send the sealed
summons for Defendant Haynes, (Doc. No. 24), his lawyer through ECF’s email program.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant Gregory Haynes’ Motion Requesting Access to Sealed Summons, (Doc.
No. 60), is GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to send the summons for Defendant
Haynes, (Doc. No. 24), to counsel for Defendant Haynes through ECF’s email
1
program.
Signed: September 16, 2019
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?