Johnson v. Campbell
Filing
8
ORDER that this case is CONTINUED for thirty (30) days for the reasons stated at the pretrial conference on April 30, 2018 and the Court REFERS and RETURNS the case to the Bankruptcy Court for approval of a finalized settlemen t agreement and for administration of the settlement agreement. Recognizing a continuance for more than thirty (30) days may be necessary, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a notice on or before May 31, 2018 informing the Court of the status of the proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court.. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 4/30/18. (clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 3:18-cv-00121-FDW
[BR Adversary Proceeding Case No. 17-03066]
R. KEITH JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JUSTICE HARRISON CAMPBELL,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court to memorialize that the trial for above-captioned case
is CONTINUED for thirty (30) days for the reasons stated at the pretrial conference on April 30,
2018 and the Court REFERS and RETURNS the case to the Bankruptcy Court for approval of a
finalized settlement agreement and for administration of the settlement agreement. Recognizing a
continuance for more than thirty (30) days may be necessary, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file
a notice on or before May 31, 2018 informing the Court of the status of the proceedings in the
Bankruptcy Court.
The Deputy Clerk shall forward a copy of the instant Order to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of North Carolina, specifically the Honorable J. Craig Whitley, U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge. The Deputy Clerk shall also serve by mail a copy of the instant Order on
Defendant. The Court further requests the Clerk for the Bankruptcy Court file a copy of this Order
in the case of Marolyn Teresa Collins (Case No. 16-31806) and the Adversary Proceeding for this
case (Case No. 17-03066).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 30, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?