Morris v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 99

ORDER that the United States Attorney shall file a pleading within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order stating whether the documents (Doc. No. 96 & 97), were filed under the authority of the United States Department of the Treasury. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/8/2022. (brl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC LISA MORRIS, MICHAEL BUI, and TUMIKA WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on documents purporting to be Notices of Appeal filed by the United States Department of the Treasury as “substituted party.” (Doc. Nos. 96, 97). This Court has not designated the Treasury Department as a substitute party. Additionally, the documents reference “federal trustee” Duane L. Berry as a class member in this litigation. The post marks on the envelopes indicate that the purported Notices of Appeal were mailed from or near the town in Michigan to which his settlement check was sent, rather than Washington, D.C. (Doc. No. 95 at 12-13; Doc. No. 12-13). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the United States Attorney shall file a pleading within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order stating whether the 1 Case 3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC Document 99 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 2 documents, (Doc. No. 96, 97), were filed under the authority of the United States Department of the Treasury. SO ORDERED. Signed: August 8, 2022 2 Case 3:18-cv-00157-RJC-DSC Document 99 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?