McNeill v. Herring et al
Filing
15
ORDER denying as premature 14 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 3/20/19. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOT TE DIVISION
3:18-cv-189-FDW
JAMES C. MCNEILL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JOHN HERRING, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery,
(Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff’s motion will be denied as premature because discovery has not
commenced in this action. Plaintiff is advised that discovery in this action does not commence
until after Defendants have been served and answered or otherwise responded to the Complaint,
and after the Court has entered a Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan in this matter setting
forth deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions. Moreover, once discovery commences,
Plaintiff must seek discovery from Defendants directly rather than filing motions with the Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery, (Doc. No. 14), is DENIED as premature.
Signed: March 20, 2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?