Red Apple Development, LLC v. Rufus Road Partners, LLC

Filing 111

ORDER granting 109 Consent MOTION to Post a Cash Bond in Lieu of a Supersedeas Bond. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b), the stay imposed by this Courts August 4, 2022 Order, (Doc. No. 108), shall remain in ef fect, and Rufus Road is allowed to deposit $250,000.00 with the Clerk of Court as security pending appeal instead of posting a supersedeas bond as directed in the Courts August 4, 2022 Order.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/17/2022. (ef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-00157-GCM-DCK RED APPLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. RUFUS ROAD PARTNERS, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Rufus Road Partners, LLC’s (“Rufus Road”) Consent Motion to Post a Cash Bond in Lieu of a Supersedeas Bond (the “Consent Motion”), (Doc. No. 109), filed November 9, 2022. Having reviewed the Consent Motion, supporting Brief, the fact that Plaintiff Red Apple Development, LLC (“Red Apple”) consents to such relief, and all other pertinent matters of record, the Court finds and concludes that the Consent Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(b), the stay imposed by this Court’s August 4, 2022 Order, (Doc. No. 108), shall remain in effect, and Rufus Road is allowed to deposit $250,000.00 with the Clerk of Court as security pending appeal instead of posting a supersedeas bond as directed in the Court’s August 4, 2022 Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: November 17, 2022 1 Case 3:19-cv-00157-GCM-DCK Document 111 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?