Gass v. Nguyen et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 21 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Counsel as to Tram Ndo and 22 Motion to Disqualify or Dismiss Counsel as to Ngoc Nguyen. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/30/19. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-197-RJC-DCK
SEMARIA GASS,
Plaintiff,
v.
NGOC NGUYEN, VI TRUONG,
CHRISTY HUONG, and TRAM NDO,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on pro se Plaintiff’s “Motion To Disqualify
Or Dismiss Counsel As To Tram Do” (Document No. 21) and “Motion To Disqualify Or Dismiss
Counsel As To Ngoc Nguyen” (Document No. 22) filed July 30, 2019. These motions have been
referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate
review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motions, the record, and applicable
authority, the undersigned will deny the motions, without prejudice.
These pending motions fail to satisfy the requirements of Local Rule 7.1(a) and (c). Simply
put, it is not clear why Plaintiff seeks the dismissal of Defendants’ attorney, what alleged conflict
exists, or what authority might support Plaintiff’s request.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion To Disqualify Or Dismiss
Counsel As To Tram Do” (Document No. 21) and “Motion To Disqualify Or Dismiss Counsel As
To Ngoc Nguyen” (Document No. 22) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Signed: July 30, 2019