Holloway v. Clark et al
Filing
11
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Default Judgment. The Court orders the Defendants to pay the Plaintiff $102,208.72 in damages, which includes $100,000 in damages relating to breach of the Purchase Agreement, and breach of three loan agreements for August 17, 2017 ($500.00), September 20, 2018 ($708.72), and January 4, 2019 ($1,000.00). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/7/2021. (eef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00582-GCM
DAVID M. HOLLOWAY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
PTB MOVIE, LLC,
RICHARD CLARK, JR.,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No.
10), pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having considered the court
record and the pertinent authorities, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions
of law:
1. That Defendant, Richard Clark Jr., is a citizen of the state of North Carolina.
2. That Defendant, PTB Movie, LLC, is a prospective North Carolina limited liability
company that has not been registered with the North Carolina Secretary of State as of
the date of this order.
3. That Plaintiff, David Mark Holloway, is a citizen of the state of California.
4. That Plaintiff filed its Complaint at law and equity for breach of contract and unjust
enrichment, on October 21, 2020;
5. That Defendants were served with process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B) in the
following manner: Service was made by delivering copies of the Summons, Civil Cover
Sheet, and Complaint to these Defendants via FedEx Priority Overnight, Direct
Case 3:20-cv-00582-GCM Document 11 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 3
Signature Required upon delivery. A copy of the Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, and
Complaint was sent addressed to Richard Clark, Jr., 4375 Hickory Hollow Road,
Gastonia, NC 28056. A copy of the Summons, Civil Cover Sheet, and Complaint was
sent addressed to Richard Clark, Jr., Member, PTB Movie, LLC, 4375 Hickory Hollow
Road, Gastonia, NC 28056.
6. That counsel for Plaintiff electronically filed an Affidavit of Service with Exhibit in
this action with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system on December 8, 2020;
7. That personal jurisdiction over Defendant Richard Clark, Jr. complies with North
Carolina General Statutes, inter alia N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-75.4(b), that personal
jurisdiction over Defendant PTB Movie LLC complies with North Carolina General
Statutes, inter alia N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-75.4(d), and that personal jurisdiction was
acquired over both Defendants by the service of process in the manner described above.
8. That the time for filing an answer or responsive pleading by all Defendants has expired,
and no answer, pleading, or other document of any kind has been filed by Defendant,
nor by anyone on his, her, its, or their behalf;
9. That Defendants have never made an appearance in this case;
10. That Default was entered against Defendants on April 16, 2021 by Frank G. Johns,
Clerk of Court.
11. That Defendants are not incompetent or minors and have not appeared before this Court
to defend this action; and
12. That Defendants are subject to Entry of Default Judgment as provided by Fed. R. Civ.
P. 55.
Case 3:20-cv-00582-GCM Document 11 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 3
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED.
1. The Court orders the Defendants to pay the Plaintiff $102,208.72 in damages,
which includes $100,000 in damages relating to breach of the Purchase Agreement,
and breach of three loan agreements for August 17, 2017 ($500.00), September 20,
2018 ($708.72), and January 4, 2019 ($1,000.00).
2. Prejudgment interest shall be awarded from the date of breach, which the Court
determines to be March 11, 2019. The rate shall be eight percent per annum, in
accordance with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 24-1.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 7, 2021
Case 3:20-cv-00582-GCM Document 11 Filed 09/08/21 Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?