Hock v. U.S. Department of Education

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/17/21. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:21-CV-00134-FDW LYNN KAREN HOCK, Plaintiff, vs. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte regarding the status of this case. “[A] district court possesses the ‘inherent power’ to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute[.] . . . [S]uch authority derives from ‘the control necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’” Eriline Co., S.A. v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 648, 654 (4th Cir. 2006) (quoting Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962)). Furthermore, “aside from the interests of the individual parties in a lawsuit, a district court has an important interest in keeping its docket from becoming clogged with dormant cases…” Eriline Co., 440 F.3d at 654. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits an involuntary dismissal for failure to prosecute a case. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed her Notice of Appeal in this matter (Doc. No. 1) on March 31, 2021. The docket demonstrates this matter has been dormant since April 9, 2021, when Plaintiff paid the required filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930. (Doc. No. 2). To date, no further filings have been made and Plaintiff has failed to file the designation of items to be included in the record on appeal and a statement of the issues to be presented to this Court as required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8009(a). Moreover, Plaintiff failed to respond to this Court’s Order, entered October 28, Case 3:21-cv-00134-FDW Document 5 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2 2021, requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for her failure to prosecute (Doc. No. 4). Accordingly, this Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute her case against Defendant and dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. The CLERK OF COURT is respectfully directed to CLOSE THE CASE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: November 17, 2021 Case 3:21-cv-00134-FDW Document 5 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?