Davis v. Bridgestone Corporation et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/7/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ams)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:21-cv-149-MOC-DCK ANDRE ANTONIO DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, pro se, ) ) vs. ) ) BRIDGESTONE CORP., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on its own motion following Plaintiff’s failure to file an Amended Complaint or to otherwise respond by the Court’s ten-day deadline. In the Court’s Order dated December 7, 2021, the Court specifically warned Plaintiff as follows: “If Plaintiff does not file an Amended Complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s Order, this Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and without further notice to Plaintiff.” (Doc. No. 17). Plaintiff has neither filed an Amended Complaint nor responded to the Court’s Order, and the time to do so has passed. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 7, 2022 1 Case 3:21-cv-00149-MOC-DCK Document 18 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?