Davis v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/7/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ams)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ANDRE ANTONIO DAVIS,
Plaintiff, pro se,
BRIDGESTONE CORP., et al.,
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on its own motion following Plaintiff’s failure
to file an Amended Complaint or to otherwise respond by the Court’s ten-day deadline. In the
Court’s Order dated December 7, 2021, the Court specifically warned Plaintiff as follows: “If
Plaintiff does not file an Amended Complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s Order, this
Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and without further
notice to Plaintiff.” (Doc. No. 17).
Plaintiff has neither filed an Amended Complaint nor responded to the Court’s Order, and
the time to do so has passed. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice and
without further notice to Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: January 7, 2022
Case 3:21-cv-00149-MOC-DCK Document 18 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?