Robinson v. Lineberger

Filing 12

ORDER denying as moot 10 Motion to Vacate, 11 MOTION to Stay. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/18/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ams)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:21-cv-622-MOC-DSC BETTY JEAN ROBINSON, Plaintiff, vs. VINCENT LINEBERGER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Vincent Lineberger’s two pro se Motions to Stay the Court’s Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. (Doc. Nos. 10, 11). Defendant’s Motions to Stay (Doc. Nos. 10, 11) are DENIED as moot because this action has already been remanded, so this Court no longer has jurisdiction. To the extent that the Court interprets the motions as motions for reconsideration, the Court denies the motions because this action was properly remanded to state court. The magistrate judge correctly found that removal was improper because there is no federal question jurisdiction and diversity of citizenship is lacking. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: November 18, 2022 1 Case 3:21-cv-00622-MOC-DSC Document 12 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?