Jakovljevic v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

ORDER granting Pltf's 19 MOTION for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, as stipulated by the parties re: 21 Stipulation. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/16/2023. (ejb)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 3:21-cv-000654-MR SLOBODAN JAKOVLJEVIC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. 19] and the parties’ Stipulation to an Award of Attorney’s Fees under EAJA [Doc. 21]. The Plaintiff seeks an award of attorneys’ fees in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”). [Doc. 19]. The parties have stipulated to an award of $4,700.00. [Doc. 21]. In light of the Court’s prior remand of this matter, and in the absence of any contention by the Commissioner that her position was substantially justified or that special circumstances exist that would render an award of attorney’s fees unjust, the Case 3:21-cv-00654-MR Document 22 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 3 Court concludes that the Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA. The parties have further stipulated that the EAJA award should be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel as the Plaintiff’s assignee. In support of this request, the Plaintiff has submitted a fee agreement executed by the Plaintiff, pursuant to which the Plaintiff has agreed to assign any EAJA fee award in favor of counsel. [Doc. 19-2]. The Court finds that the Commissioner should accept this assignment of the awarded fees by the Plaintiff to counsel and upon receipt of such assignment, the Commissioner will pay that award of fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, provided that it is shown that the Plaintiff does not owe any debt to the United States Government which is subject to offset. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 286 (2010). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: (1) The Plaintiff’s Petition [Doc. 19] is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($4,700.00), which sum is in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); (2) Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, or some other time as determined by the Court upon good cause shown, the 2 Case 3:21-cv-00654-MR Document 22 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 3 Commissioner shall inform Plaintiff’s counsel whether the Plaintiff owes a debt to the Government by which this fee award may be offset. Before any funds are disbursed to counsel, the Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide a valid fee assignment to the Defendant; 3) In the event that past-due benefits are awarded on remand, the Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after being served with notice of the past-due benefits award to file for an award of fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and (4) No additional Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) may be filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 16, 2023 3 Case 3:21-cv-00654-MR Document 22 Filed 01/17/23 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?