Hush v. Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER denying 14 Plaintiffs pro se Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment; denying 15 Plaintiffs pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/18/2022. (ams)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:21-cv-655-MOC
LOTOYA HUSH,

Plaintiff,
v.
SCHWAN’S CONSUMER BRANDS, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Answer to
Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and on
Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 15).
The Court DENIES both motions.
Furthermore, the Court notes that Plaintiff is now represented by counsel.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Answer to
Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and
Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 15),
are DENIED.

Signed: November 18, 2022

Case 3:21-cv-00655-MOC-DCK Document 35 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2

Case 3:21-cv-00655-MOC-DCK Document 35 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2