Hush v. Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER denying 14 Plaintiffs pro se Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment; denying 15 Plaintiffs pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/18/2022. (ams)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:21-cv-655-MOC
LOTOYA HUSH,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCHWAN’S CONSUMER BRANDS, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Answer to
Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and on
Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 15).
The Court DENIES both motions.
Furthermore, the Court notes that Plaintiff is now represented by counsel.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Answer to
Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and
Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 15),
are DENIED.
Signed: November 18, 2022
Case 3:21-cv-00655-MOC-DCK Document 35 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:21-cv-00655-MOC-DCK Document 35 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?