Algaier v. Credit Control Services, Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER granting 46 Motion Accept Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ; granting 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment Partial Summary Judgment , ( Responses due by 2/19/2024, Replies due by 2/26/2024 ). Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/5/24. (mga)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CASE NO. 3:22-CV-475-RJC-DCK
SEAN ALGAIER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CREDIT CONTROL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion To Accept Memorandum
Of Law In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment” (Document No. 46) and
the “Motion For Extension Of Time To file Responses And Replies To Dispositive Motions”
(Document No. 47) filed February 4, 2024. These motions have been referred to the undersigned
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having
carefully considered the motions and the record, the undersigned will grant the motions.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the “Motion To Accept Memorandum Of Law In
Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment” (Document No. 46) is GRANTED.
The “Memorandum In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment” (Document
No. 44) is accepted as timely filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the “Motion For Extension Of Time To File Responses
And Replies To Dispositive Motions” (Document No. 47) is GRANTED. Responses to the
pending dispositive motions (Document Nos. 39 and 43) shall be filed on or before February 19,
2024; Reply briefs in support of the pending motions shall be filed on or before February 26,
2024.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: February 5, 2024
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?