Holt v. Borland P.C.

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/28/24. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:23-CV-00536-FDW-SCR HEAVEN HOLT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. BRETT M BORLAND P.C., Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte concerning the status of this case. On February 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. No. 6.) The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion instructing her to “file a renewed motion providing argument, applicable law, and evidence to support default judgment as to liability and to allow the Court to independently determine the amount of damages.” (Doc. No. 7.) Plaintiff failed to file a renewed motion for default judgment. On July 31, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 9.) Plaintiff was provided a response deadline of August 16, 2024, and forewarned that failure to comply with the Order could result in dismissal of case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Id.) Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s order. Plaintiff has failed to renew her motion for default judgment or file any other pleadings in this matter. The Court finds it is important to keep its docket from becoming backlogged with dormant cases. See Erline Co., S.A. v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 648, 654 (4th Cir. 2006). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to CLOSE THE CASE. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: August 27, 2024 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?