Henderson v. Hawk et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Reconsideration as to Shanriqua Henderson. However, Plaintiff's original Complaint fails to state a cognizable claim. Therefore, the Court will allow Plaintiff thirty day s in which to submit an Amended Complaint, in which she must allege her specific facts and claims, including why this Court has jurisdiction to address her claims. The Clerk is respectfully instructed to reopen this action. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 8/27/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
3:24-cv-158-MOC
SHANRIQUA HENDERSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
Vs.
VIRGINIA HAWK, et al.,
Defendant.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of this
Court’s prior Order (Doc. No. 15) granting Plaintiff’s motion for a voluntary dismissal. (Doc.
No. 11). Plaintiff now asks for the Court to reconsider the dismissal and allow her to proceed
with this action.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 15) will be GRANTED. However,
Plaintiff’s original Complaint fails to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff does not allege sufficient
facts to indicate to the Court what she is complaining about, and she simply cites numerous
federal statutes and laws as her purported jurisdiction.
Therefore, the Court will allow Plaintiff thirty days in which to submit an Amended
Complaint, in which she must allege her specific facts and claims, including why this Court
has jurisdiction to address her claims.
Plaintiff is warned that if she does not file an Amended Complaint within thirty
days of entry of this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice and
without further notice to Plaintiff.
The Clerk is respectfully instructed to reopen this action.

1

Signed: August 27, 2024

2