Bey v. State of North Carolina

Filing 3

ORDER re 1 Notice and Affidavit: The Court has reviewed the pro se filings, and has determined that this action should be construed as a civil rights action with a Nature of Suit 440. The Clerk will be instructed to recharacterize the action accordingly. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. on 1/28/2025. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mdp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:25-mc-7-MOC SALADIN-MUHAMMAD BEY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Mr. Saladin-Muhammad Bey filed this pro se action pursuant to various legal theories; it was docketed as a miscellaneous civil action. The Court has reviewed the pro se filings, and has determined that this action should be construed as a civil rights action with a Nature of Suit 440. The Clerk will be instructed to recharacterize the action accordingly. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Clerk is respectfully instructed to recharacterize this action as a civil rights action pursuant to Nature of Suit 440. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 28, 2025

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?