USA v. Rash

Filing 33

ORDER denying 24 Defendant's Motion for Hearing; denying 27 Defendant's Motion for USDA and US Department of Justice to turn over proof of what cattle and equipment brought during bankruptcy. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 9/18/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:05-CV-00244-RLV-DSC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH W. RASH, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s pro se “Motion for Hearing” (document # 24) filed July 24, 2015 and Defendant’s pro se “Motion for USDA and US Department of Justice to turn over proof of what the cattle and equipment brought during bankruptcy” (document #27) filed August 21, 2015. The Government filed a Response (document #28) to the Motions on August 28, 2015. This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and the Motions are ripe for determination. For the reasons stated in the Government’s Response, the Court will deny Defendant’s pro se Motions. Defendant has not challenged the Government’s compliance with statutory requirements in seeking the Writ. Defendant also failed to file a valid request for exemptions or challenge the validity of the Writ. Consequently, he is not entitled a hearing. NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s pro se “Motion for Hearing” (document # 24) filed July 24, 2015 and “Defendant’s pro se Motion for USDA and US Department of Justice to turn over proof of what the cattle and equipment brought during bankruptcy” (document #27) filed August 21, 2015 are DENIED. 2. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum and Order to counsel for the Government, to pro se Defendant; and to the Honorable Richard L. Voorhees. SO ORDERED. Signed: September 18, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?