Armstrong v. Odom

Filing 54

ORDER directing the parties to file a Status Report regarding the requested relief. Status Report due by 9/17/2013. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 9/10/13. (smj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL DOCKET NO.: 5:07CV37-RLV EMILY M. ARMSTRONG, a minor, by and through her Guardian ad litem, WILLIAM W. PLYLER,1 WILLIAM E. ARMSTRONG, AND SANDRA ARMSTRONG, Plaintiffs / Counter-Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) DR. ALDONA ZOFIA WOS, in her ) official capacity as secretary of the ) North Carolina Department of Health ) 2 and Human Services, ) Defendant / Counter-Plaintiff. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wos v. E.M.A. ex rel. Johnson, decided March 20, 2013. 133 S.Ct. 1391 (2013). On May 31, 2012, the Court imposed a stay of the case with the instruction and expectation that the parties would update the Court within thirty days of a ruling from the Supreme Court. (Doc. 39). Nothing has been filed or otherwise communicated to the Court since the Supreme Court ruled. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties shall file a Status Report no later than Tuesday, September 17, 2013, regarding the requested relief  specifically whether the Court must undertake the task of judicial allocation (dividing Plaintiff’s tort settlement) for purposes of 1 Effective October 2, 2009, William W. Plyler was appointed and substituted for Stephanie J. Gibbs as guardian ad litem for Emily Armstrong. (Document #24.) 2 Effective January 5, 2013, Dr. Aldona Zofia Wos replaced the originally named Defendant, Carmen Hooker Odom, as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. Defendant’s recovery of the portion of the award attributable to medical expenses. Signed: September 10, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?