Lerch et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 4 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to Federal MDL. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/30/2009. (cbb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO: 5:09-CV-130-RLV-DCK RALPH LERCH and KAREN LERCH, Plaintiff, v. DAVOL Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants' "Unopposed Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Transfer to Federal MDL" (Document No. 4) filed on December 23, 2009.1 The motion has been referred to the Magistrate Judge, and immediate review is appropriate. Having fully considered the record, and noting the Plaintiffs' consent. the undersigned will grant the requested stay for the following reasons: Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. ("Defendants") indicate in their motion that "all federal court cases concerning the Composix® Kugel® Patch have been or imminently will be transferred to the District of Rhode Island for consolidated pretrial proceedings." (Document No. 4, p. 2); see In re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Prods. Liab. Litig., 493 F. Supp. 2d 1371, 1373 (J.P.M.L. 2007) (ordering that centralization was warranted for 13 actions and 18 potential tag-along actions pending in multiple districts, and that the District of Rhode Island was the appropriate transferee forum). The present Defendants therefore move this Court for an order staying all deadlines and any other matters here, pending transfer of this "tag-along" action to the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island for centralized pretrial proceedings in the multidistrict litigation 1 J.P.M.L. is the abbreviation for the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. ("MDL") cited above. Id. (observing that consolidated pretrial proceedings will ensure "that pretrial proceedings will be conducted in a manner leading to the just and expeditious resolution of all actions to the overall benefit of the parties"). Plaintiffs do not oppose the request for stay pending transfer. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendants' "Unopposed Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Transfer to Federal MDL" (Document No. 4) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: December 30, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?