Eckles v. USA

Filing 14

ORDER AND NOTICE ordering that Petitioner has 30 days from the entry of this Order to file her response re 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/24/2011. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 12/23/10. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)

Download PDF
Eckles v. USA Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:09cv137-V-02 (5:05cr9-V) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) DARLENE ECKLES, ORDER and NOTICE THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed December 20, 2010 (Doc. No. 13). In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, of the heavy burden that she carries in responding to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides in relevant part: (c)(1) A party asserting that a fact ... is genuinely disputed must support the assertion by: (A) citing to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials; or (B) showing that the materials cited do not establish the absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support that Dockets.Justia.com fact. ... (c)(4) An affidavit or declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1)(A) and (B); 56(c)(4) (2010). This language means that if Petitioner has any evidence to offer to show that there is a genuine factual dispute for resolution, she must now present it to this Court in a form which would otherwise be admissible at trial, that is, in the form of affidavits or unsworn declarations. An affidavit is a written statement, made on personal knowledge and sworn before a notary public. Lumoa v. Potter, 351 F. Supp. 2d 426, 430 (M.D.N.C. 2004) (quoting Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 859 (7th Cir. 1985). An unsworn declaration is one made in writing and subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury. 28 U.S.C. § 1746. As a last resort, Petitioner may show by affidavit or unsworn declaration that, for specified reasons, she cannot present facts essential to justify her opposition to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Petitioner is further advised that if she fails to properly support an assertion of fact or fails to properly address Respondent's assertion of fact as required by Rule 56(c), the Court may consider the fact undisputed for purposes of the motion; it may grant summary judgment if the motion and supporting materials ­ including the facts considered undisputed ­ show that the movant is entitled to it; or it may issue any other appropriate order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(2) through (4). Petitioner's affidavits or unsworn declaration must be presented to this Court within 2 thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order to file her response, including any evidence, to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and Notice to the parties. SO ORDERED. Signed: December 23, 2010 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?