Handy v. Astrue
Filing
28
ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/30/2011. (cbb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-013-RLV-DCK
TAMMY HANDY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff’s “Motion For Attorney Fees”
(Document No. 25) filed December 29, 2011. This motion has been referred to the undersigned
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having
carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the
motion, without prejudice to re-file.
Plaintiff’s motion does not appear to indicate that the requirement of consultation has been
met pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 (B).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion For Attorney Fees” (Document
No. 25) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Signed: December 30, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?