Handy v. Astrue

Filing 28

ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/30/2011. (cbb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-013-RLV-DCK TAMMY HANDY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff’s “Motion For Attorney Fees” (Document No. 25) filed December 29, 2011. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice to re-file. Plaintiff’s motion does not appear to indicate that the requirement of consultation has been met pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 (B). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion For Attorney Fees” (Document No. 25) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed: December 30, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?