Ruthfield et al v. National City Mortgage, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER directing PNC Bank National Association to provide supplemental information clarifying its state of citizenship and provide the Court with the location of its main office on or before Monday, June 20, 2011. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 6/7/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:11-CV-00045-RLV RONALD & SUSAN GAIL RUTHFIELD, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) successor by merger to National City Real ) Estate Services, LLC as successor by merger ) to National City Mortgage, Inc., ) ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte upon initial review of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and accompanying Memorandum in Support, filed April 4, 2011, as well as Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, filed May 6, 2011. The Court hereby directs Defendant PNC Bank National Association to provide supplemental information clarifying its state of citizenship by Monday, June 20, 2011.1 “All national banking associations shall, for the purposes of all other actions by or against them be deemed citizens of the States in which they are respectively located.” 28 U.S.C. § 1348 (2006). The United States Supreme Court has interpreted this statute to mean that a national bank “is a citizen of the State in which its main office, as set forth in its articles of association, is located.” Wachovia Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. Schmidt, 546 U.S. 303, 307 (2006). 1 Defendant states that “PNC is a national association with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania.” (Notice of Removal, ¶4b) IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant PNC Bank National Association is to RESPOND accordingly and provide the Court with the location of its main office on or before Monday, June 20, 2011. Signed: June 7, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?