Messer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Filing 20

ORDER granting 18 Plf's Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/17/13. (smj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION DEBORAH E. MESSER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 5:11-CV-88 ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Plaintiff’s Application for an Award of Fees and Expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed on January 8, 2013. By Response dated January 17, 2013, the Defendant advises that he does not oppose an award of legal fees in the amount of $1592.50 provided this is the only petition filed by Plaintiff in this case under 28 U.S.C. §2412(d). IT IS ORDERED that “Plaintiff’s Application for an Award of Fees and Expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act” (Docket no. 18) is GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney fees in the amount of $1592.50, and that, pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, ---- U.S. ----, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first and, if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the Government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees, and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. U.S.C. §2412(d) shall be filed. No additional petition pursuant to 28 SO ORDERED. Signed: January 17, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?