Nance et al v. Chambers et al
Filing
33
ORDER granting dfts' 21 Motions in Limine; granting plfs' 22 Motion in Limine (a) as to subsequent remedial measures; and (b) as to opinion testimony of Dr. Brian Burig, the Court will defer ruling on this motion subject to a voir dire hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/10/2014. (cbb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-00184-DSC
LEONARD NANCE AND HARTFORD
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
AS SUBROGEE OF FNA POLYMER
CORP.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THOMAS R. CHAMBERS, JR. AND
SOUTHWESTERN TRUCKING, INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine as to
Defendants’ Expert Witness Testimony and Evidence of Subsequent Remedial Measures”
(document # 22) and “Defendants’ First Motions in Limine” (document #21) both filed
December 30, 2013 and the parties’ associated briefs and exhibits. The Court conducted a
pretrial telephone conference with counsel on January 9, 2014.
The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
These Motions are now ripe for the Court’s consideration.
After fully considering the arguments, the record, and the applicable authority, the Court
ORDERS:
1. With regard to Plaintiff’s Motions In Limine:
(a) As to subsequent remedial measures, the Motion is GRANTED;
(b) As to opinion testimony of Dr. Brian Burig, the Court will defer ruling
on this Motion subject to a voir dire hearing.
2. With regard to Defendants’ Motions in Limine, the Motions are GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: 1/10/2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?