Shoemake v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Filing
251
ORDER granting 240 Motion to Seal Documents 241 and 245. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/23/2015. (cbb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-013-RLV-DCK
ANGELA SHOEMAKE, Individually, and
as Natural Parent and Guardian of minor
child, J.S.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ELI LILLY & COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Defendant Eli Lilly And Company’s
Motion To Seal Its Initial Motions In Limine And Exhibits Thereto” (Document No. 240) filed
November 18, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the
motion and the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Defendant Eli Lilly And Company’s Motion To
Seal Its Initial Motions In Limine And Exhibits Thereto” (Document No. 240) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following documents shall be sealed until
otherwise ordered by the Court:
1. Motion in limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence or Argument of Prozac’s Change from
Pregnancy Category B to C;
2. Motion in limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence and Argument that Lilly Should Have
Established a Pregnancy Registry or Conducted Other Additional Testing; and
3. Exhibits 9-16 from the “Index to Exhibits in Defendant’s Memoranda in Support of
Motions in limine Filed November 18, 2015” (the “Index”).
SO ORDERED.
Signed: November 23, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?