Jorge Gonzalez-Jaimes v. USA
Filing
18
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 12/29/2015. (cbb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
5:13-CV-00049-RLV
(5:03-CR-00004-RLV-3)
JORGE GONZALEZ-JAIMES,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Petitioner’s motion for
reconsideration of the Order denying his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Petitioner contends that relief was denied based on the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in United
States v. Surratt, 797 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 2015), however that is plainly not the case. As the Court
noted, the Fourth Circuit, in the case of In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328 (4th Cir. 2000), found that
relief from a sentencing enhancement under § 2241 is only allowed when:
(1) at the time of conviction settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court
established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct
appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law changed such that the conduct
of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed not to be criminal; and (3) the
prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 because the new rule
is not of one of constitutional law.
Id. at 333-34.
For the reasons stated in the Court’s Order, (Doc. No. 13), the motion for reconsideration
is denied.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is
1
DENIED. (Doc. No. 15).
Signed: December 29, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?