Jorge Gonzalez-Jaimes v. USA

Filing 18

ORDER denying 15 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 12/29/2015. (cbb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:13-CV-00049-RLV (5:03-CR-00004-RLV-3) JORGE GONZALEZ-JAIMES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of the Order denying his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner contends that relief was denied based on the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. Surratt, 797 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 2015), however that is plainly not the case. As the Court noted, the Fourth Circuit, in the case of In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328 (4th Cir. 2000), found that relief from a sentencing enhancement under § 2241 is only allowed when: (1) at the time of conviction settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed not to be criminal; and (3) the prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not of one of constitutional law. Id. at 333-34. For the reasons stated in the Court’s Order, (Doc. No. 13), the motion for reconsideration is denied. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is 1 DENIED. (Doc. No. 15). Signed: December 29, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?