Houck v. LifeStore Bank et al

Filing 98

ORDER denying as moot 88 Consent Motion to Amend Scheduling Order; denying 96 Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal; denying 96 Motion to Stay Proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/1/16. (smj)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:13-CV-66-DSC
DIANA LOUISE HOUCK, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LIFESTORE BANK, et. al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Certification of
Interlocutory Appeal and to Stay Proceedings” (document #96) and the parties’ briefs and
submissions.
For the reasons previously stated in the Court’s “Order of Referral to the Bankruptcy
Court” (document #93), and in Defendant Substitute Trustee Services, Inc. “Response …”
(document #97) and “Memorandum …” (document #97-1), the Motion is denied.
The parties’ “Consent Motion to Amend Scheduling Order” (document #88) which
predated the referral of this case to the Bankruptcy Court, is denied as moot.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties’ counsel, the Clerk of the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and to the Honorable
Laura T. Beyer, Chief Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
North Carolina.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 1, 2016

1