Leavitt v. NC Department of Public Safety et al

Filing 15

ORDER ordering that Plaintiff shall provide proof that he has exhausted his administrative remedies, or a written explanation as to why he has not exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing his 1983 complaint. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/26/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:14-cv-27-FDW OWEN D. LEAVITT, Plaintiff, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on remand from the Fourth Circuit for entry of an order allowing Plaintiff additional time to supplement the record to demonstrate that he has fully exhausted his administrative remedies within the prison’s administrative remedy procedure. Plaintiff will be provided 30-days from entry of this Order to provide documentation to demonstrate that he has fully exhausted his administrative remedies as to each claim that he has presented in his pro se complaint which he filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Failure to provide the necessary documentation, or to file a response explaining why he could not fully exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit, will result in an order dismissing his unexhausted claims. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide proof that he has exhausted his administrative remedies, or a written explanation as to why he has not exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing his § 1983 complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of the unexhausted claims in his § 1983 complaint and without further notice an initial review of any exhausted claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: November 26, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?