Mahan et al v. American Security Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 28

ORDER advising the plaintiffs that they have the right to respond to re 22 ASMC's MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs' responses due by 1/26/2015. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/16/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 5:14-cv-00176-MOC
BRANDON HOLLAND
LINDSAY H. MAHAN,
Plaintiffs,
Vs.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
AMERICAN SECURITY MORTGAGE
CORPORATION
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION
DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
FANNIE MAE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ROSEBORO
ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on ASMC’s Motion to Dismiss (#22). Plaintiffs are
advised that they have the right to respond to such motion and present in that writing the reasons
why they believe their Complaint should not be dismissed. Such response must be filed within
the time provided in this Order for a Response and served on counsel for the moving party and
all other counsel of record as evidenced in a certificate of service attached to plaintiffs’
Response. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action by reason of default.

-1-

ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiffs file their Response not later January
26, 2015.

Signed: January 16, 2015

-2-