Mahan et al v. American Security Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER advising the plaintiffs that they have the right to respond to re 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action by reason of default. Plaintiffs' responses due by 1/26/2015. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/16/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 5:14-cv-00176-MOC BRANDON HOLLAND and LINDSAY H. MAHAN, Plaintiffs, Vs. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; AMERICAN SECURITY MORTGAGE CORPORATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; FANNIE MAE; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ROSEBORO ORDER THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association as Trustee for Securitized Trust Fannie Mae REMIC Trust 2012-83 (“Fannie Mae”), Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (#19). Plaintiffs are advised that they have the right to respond to such motion and present in that writing the reasons why they believe their Complaint should not be dismissed. Such response must be filed within the time provided in this Order for a Response and served on counsel for the moving party and all other counsel of record as evidenced in a certificate of service attached to plaintiffs’ Response. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action by reason of default. -1- ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiffs file their Response not later January 26, 2015. Signed: January 16, 2015 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?