Mahan et al v. American Security Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
29
ORDER advising the plaintiffs that they have the right to respond to re 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action by reason of default. Plaintiffs' responses due by 1/26/2015. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 1/16/15. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 5:14-cv-00176-MOC
BRANDON HOLLAND and
LINDSAY H. MAHAN,
Plaintiffs,
Vs.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE;
AMERICAN SECURITY MORTGAGE
CORPORATION;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC.;
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION; FANNIE MAE; and
DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ROSEBORO
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendants Federal National Mortgage
Association as Trustee for Securitized Trust Fannie Mae REMIC Trust 2012-83 (“Fannie Mae”),
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss (#19). Plaintiffs are advised that they have the right to respond to such motion and
present in that writing the reasons why they believe their Complaint should not be dismissed.
Such response must be filed within the time provided in this Order for a Response and served on
counsel for the moving party and all other counsel of record as evidenced in a certificate of
service attached to plaintiffs’ Response. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of this action
by reason of default.
-1-
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiffs file their Response not later January
26, 2015.
Signed: January 16, 2015
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?