Heath v. Colvin
Filing
19
CONSENT ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Commissioner of SS shall pay to Plaintiff the sum of $3,646.00, sent to Plaintiff's Counsel's address in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 USC, Section 2412(d). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 11/5/15. (smj)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
No. 5:15-cv-8-GCM
TRAVIS HEATH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order
and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United
States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social
Security should pay the sum of $3,646.00 for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to
Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $3,646.00, sent to Plaintiff’s Counsel’s office address in full satisfaction of any and all
claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is
dismissed with prejudice.
CONSENTED TO:
/s/CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/PETER A. HEINLEIN
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Room 646, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (410) 965-2350
Fax: (410) 597-0137
Peter.Heinlein@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Signed: November 5, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?