Schrum v. Colvin

Filing 8

ORDER directing parties to discuss ruling in Mascio and its implications in the specific case. Status Report due by 6/8/2015. If requested, Supplemental Briefing due by 6/15/2015. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 5/21/2015. (tmg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ALL DIVISIONS
CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD L. VOORHEES

TORRES v. COLVIN
1:14CV7
)
DEL VECCHIO v. COLVIN
1:14CV116 )
WHITE v. COLVIN
1:14CV161 )
GUINN v. COLVIN
1:14CV182 )
DILLINGHAM v. COLVIN
1:14CV210 )
MARTIN v. COLVIN
1:14CV234 )
CRAIG v. COLVIN
1:14CV256 )
ADKINS v. COLVIN
1:15CV1
)
FORERO v. COLVIN
1:15CV6
)
BROWN v. COLVIN
1:15CV46
)
LEDFORD v. COLVIN
1:15CV56
)
MOSS v. COLVIN
1:15CV75
)
GRIFFIS v. COLVIN
2:12CV29
)
HAGEDORN v. COLVIN
2:12CV85
)
BROWN v. COLVIN
2:13CV33
)
BASTY v. COLVIN
2:13CV37
)
BRAMBLETT v. COLVIN
2:14CV11
)
KISSELBURG v. COLVIN
2:14CV48
)
ASHCRAFT v. COLVIN
3:13CV417 )
WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
3:13CV701 )
FRALEY v. COLVIN
3:14CV192 )
ELLERBE v. COLVIN
3:14CV275 )
BROWN v. COLVIN
3:14CV409 )
MELTON v. COLVIN
3:14CV447 )
HICKLIN-JONES v. COLVIN
3:14CV584 )
HAND v. COLVIN
3:14CV626 )
GRAHAM v. COLVIN
3:14CV633 )
MYERS v. COLVIN
3:14CV655 )
SMITH v. COLVIN
3:15CV72
)
GUYTON v. COLVIN
3:15CV109 )
BURKE v. COLVIN
5:12CV191 )
ANDERSON v. COLVIN
5:13CV55
)
MASH v. COLVIN
5:13CV139 )
BRADSHAW v. COLVIN
5:14CV5
)
SINGER v. COLVIN
5:14CV34
)
WOOD v. COLVIN
5:14CV171 )
SCHRUM v. COLVIN
5:15CV45
)
__________________________________________)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte in light of Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d
632 (4th Cir. 2015).1 The parties are hereby directed to consult one another and discuss, in good
faith, whether the ruling in Mascio requires sentence four remand pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
for rehearing or other administrative proceedings. The parties shall then advise the Court via
Status Report to be filed with the Court on or before June 8, 2015 on this issue, namely,
whether remand to the Commissioner of Social Security is appropriate. The Status Report must
certify that counsel have, in fact, discussed Mascio and its implications in the specific case. If a
consent to remand is not proposed and supplemental briefing is requested by either party, all
supplemental filings should be submitted on or before June 15, 2015.
SO ORDERED.

Signed: May 21, 2015

1

The mandate issued on May 11, 2015.