Adams v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc. et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 39 Joint MOTION to Stay Case Pending Global Mediation. Case is stayed until 7/10/2017. See Order for further details regarding deadlines and hearings. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/3/2017. (kby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-071-RLV-DCK BETTY ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.; MEDTRONIC, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the parties’ “Joint Stipulation To Stay Case Pending Global Mediation” (Document No. 39) filed December 28, 2016. The Court construes this filing as a joint motion, and it has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting agreement of the parties, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties’ “Joint Stipulation To Stay Case Pending Global Mediation” (Document No. 39) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. The case is STAYED until July 10, 2017; 2. All scheduled deadlines, hearing dates, and trial dates in this case are stayed six months from their currently scheduled dates; 3. On or before July 10, 2017, Plaintiff and Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc., shall make a joint filing, which will either: a. Inform the Court that the parties have reached a settlement and stipulate to dismissal of all claims against Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. with prejudice; or b. Inform the Court that the parties have not reached a settlement, and that both Plaintiff and Defendants are adhering to the postponed scheduling dates, and anticipate being prepared for trial in June 2018. SO ORDERED. Signed: January 3, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?