Niloy, Inc. d/b/a DCT Systems v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER granting 50 Motion to Intervene and To File A Complaint In Intervention. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/6/2017. (nvc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-029-RLV-DCK NILOY, INC. d/b/a DCT SYSTEMS, Plaintiff, v. LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Ronald Bouchard And Dennis Fink’s Unopposed Motion To Intervene & To File A Complaint In Intervention” (Document No. 50) filed February 3, 2017. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting that Plaintiff and Defendant do not oppose the motion, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that “Ronald Bouchard And Dennis Fink’s Unopposed Motion To Intervene & To File A Complaint In Intervention” (Document No. 50) is GRANTED.1 Signed: July 6, 2017 1 The Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, revised January 1, 2012, at Part II, Section A, Paragraph 8, provide that: “If filing a document requires leave of the Court, such as an amended complaint, the attorney shall attach the proposed document as an exhibit to the motion according to the procedures in IV. If the Court grants the motion, the filer will be responsible for electronically filing the document on the case docket.”

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?