Webb v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/13/2017. (tmg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:16-CV-00092-GCM-DCK Michael Wayne Webb, Plaintiff, V. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Consent Order This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Special Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3700.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff, the sum of $3700.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. CONSENTED TO: Date: September 12, 2017 /s/ Amelia N. Patton Amelia N. Patton Bar Number: 31718 Attorney for Plaintiff Patton Law Offices, P.L.L.C. P.O. Box 565 212 West Main Street Elkin, NC 28621 336-844-2870 E-mail: apatton@pattonlawnc.com Date: September 12, 2017 /s/ Mary Ellen Russell MARY ELLEN RUSSELL Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 6401 Security Boulevard Room 611, Altmeyer Building Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: 410-966-6388 Fax: 410-597-0137 Email: Mary.Ellen.Russell@ssa.gov Signed: September 13, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?