Covington v. Duncan et al
ORDER denying 26 Motion for Order Granting Discovery. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/10/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nvc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
KARL L. COVINGTON, JR.,
FNU DUNCAN, et al.,
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff’s “Motion for an Order
Compelling Discovery,” (Doc. No. 26), in which Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendants to
provide Plaintiff with the “real name, address, and employers file as well as use of force incident
report with defendants real name and statements to find defendants real name and prove
This motion denied as moot because the Court granted Plaintiff limited discovery for the
purpose of identifying Defendant Murray on January 4, 2018. (Doc. No. 25). To the extent that
Plaintiff seeks discovery beyond that necessary to identify and serve Defendant Murray, it is
denied as premature. See (Doc. No. 18).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion for Order Granting Discovery,”
(Doc. No. 26), is DENIED.
Signed: January 10, 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?