Richey Brothers Trucking, LLC v. West Coast Distributing, Inc. et al
Filing
26
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/21/16. (mga)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH
CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION
CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-143-RLV-DCK
Richey Brothers Trucking, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
West Coast Distributing, Inc.; Leonard’s )
Express, Inc.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________________)
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the joint motion of Plaintiff Richey Brothers
Trucking, LLC (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants West Coast Distributing, Inc. and Leonard’s
Express, Inc. (“Defendants”); and it appearing to the Court that discovery and the trial in this
action may involve the production and disclosure of confidential, proprietary, or sensitive
information requiring protection against unrestricted disclosure or use;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that pursuant
to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following confidentiality provisions
shall govern all information and documents disclosed in discovery in this action:
1.
Certain information and documents to be produced by Plaintiff and Defendants
during discovery in this litigation may contain trade secrets or other proprietary, confidential
research, development, or commercial information that should be considered confidential and
protected from unreasonable disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
2.
The information and documents to be considered as confidential and disclosed
only in accordance with the terms of this Consent Protective Order (“this Order”) shall include,
without limitation, all documents or information whether in hard copy or electronic form
designated in accordance with the terms of this Order and supplied in response to the demands or
requests of either party, formal or informal, regardless of whether said information is produced
or disclosed by a party or by any affiliated person or entity, or formerly affiliated person or
entity.
3.
All information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” in accordance with the terms of this Order and disclosed in
discovery in this action shall be used solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this
litigation and shall not be used for any other purpose.
4.
“Discovery Material” shall mean and include any document (whether in hard
copy or computer readable form), thing, deposition testimony, interrogatory answers, responses
to requests for admissions and/or production, or other information provided in discovery in this
action. Any party may, in good faith, designate Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY.” Discovery Material designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” shall contain non-public proprietary information, whether personal or
business-related; information protected from disclosure by contractual obligations with third
parties; or information protected from disclosure by law. Certain limited types of
“CONFIDENTIAL” information may be alternatively designated, as defined and detailed below,
as
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS
EYES
ONLY.”
The
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” designation shall be reserved for confidential
information that constitutes, reflects, or concerns trade secrets, know-how or proprietary data,
business, financial, or commercial information, the disclosure of which is likely to cause harm to
the competitive position of the party making the confidential designations of Discovery Material.
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS
EYES
ONLY”
information, as used in this Order, shall refer to any information so designated.
5.
All information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be maintained in confidence
by the parties to whom such information is produced or given, shall be used solely for the
purposes of this litigation, and shall not be disclosed to any person except:
(a)
The Court (including court reporters, stenographic reporters and
videographers, and court personnel);
(b)
The attorneys of record, their partners, employees, contractors, and
associates of outside counsel (collectively hereafter referred to as “Outside Counsel”);
(c)
Officers or employees of Plaintiff in this action, and officers and
employees of Defendants in this action; provided, that such officers or employees shall receive
such “CONFIDENTIAL” information solely on a “need to know” basis for purposes of
prosecuting or defending this litigation and for no other purposes;
(d)
Subject to the terms of paragraph 13 below, experts and their staff and
litigation support personnel and their staff retained by Outside Counsel in this litigation; and
(e)
Any mediator and/or arbitrator selected with the consent of all parties or
(f)
Any other person as to whom the producing party agrees in writing prior
by the Court;
to such disclosure.
6.
All information designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES
ONLY” shall be maintained in confidence for use by the attorneys of the parties, shall be used
solely for the purposes of this litigation, and shall not be disclosed to any person except those
listed in subparagraphs (a), (b), (d), (e), and (f) of paragraph 5 above.
7.
designated
Nothing in the Order shall be taken as assent by a non-producing party that
information is in fact “CONFIDENTIAL,”
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY,” or is entitled to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure. If counsel for the non-producing party believes that a confidentiality
designation is not appropriate or justified, counsel for the non-producing party will notify counsel
for the producing party of its belief that the information should not be so designated or should
be disclosable to persons other than those allowed by this order. A party shall not be obligated
to challenge the propriety of a designation at the time made, and the failure to do so shall not
preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Such a challenge shall be written, shall be served on
counsel for the Producing Party, and shall particularly identify the documents or information
that the Receiving Party contends should be differently designated. The parties shall use their best
efforts to resolve promptly and informally such disputes. If the parties do not reach agreement on
the correct designation of the information within ten (10) business days of service of a challenge,
the non-producing party may file a motion with the Court setting forth the non- producing
party’s reasons as to why the designation should be changed. Unless and until the Court issues
a ruling that the information may be disclosed to persons other than those authorized by this
Order, the contested designation shall remain in place and treated consistently with the terms of
this Order.
8.
Nothing in this Order shall preclude any party from applying to this Court for
relief from any provision hereof, or from asserting that certain discovery materials should receive
greater confidentiality protection than that provided herein, in accordance with Rule 26(c) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
9.
No
designation
of
documents
as
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” shall be effective unless there is placed or
affixed on such document a “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS
EYES ONLY” notice or the equivalent. Where practicable, such notice shall be placed near the
Bates number. In the case of computer, audiovisual, or other electronic or magnetic medium,
such notice shall be placed on the medium and its protective cover, if any. Testimony given at a
deposition or hearing may be designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 16 of this Order.
Any designation that is inadvertently omitted from a document or testimony may be corrected by
written notification to opposing counsel, but any disclosure prior to such notification shall not be
a violation of this Order.
10.
All “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES
ONLY” information shall be maintained under the control of Outside Counsel, who shall be
responsible for preventing any disclosure thereof except in accordance with the terms of this
Order.
11.
In the event that either party wishes to file “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” Discovery Materials with the Court, the party
must follow the procedures set forth in Local Rule 6.1 for the filing of documents under seal and
filing the motions to seal documents. The parties understand that, before ruling on any motion to
seal, the Court may give the public notice of the motion and a reasonable opportunity to challenge
it. The parties further understand that the Court will rule favorably upon any motion to seal only
after carefully weighing the interest advanced by the movant and those interests favoring
public access to judicial documents and records, and only upon finding that the interests
advanced by the movant override any constitutional or common law right of public access which
may attach to the documents, things, and/or information at issue. Documents submitted under
seal in accordance with this paragraph will remain under seal pending the Court’s ruling. If the
party desiring that the information be maintained under seal does not timely file a Motion to
Seal, then the materials will be deemed unsealed, without need for order of the Court.
12.
Information produced by non-parties during the course of this action may be
designated under this Order by such non-party or by a party as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” by following the procedures set
forth herein or may be deemed so confidential as not to be disclosed under any circumstances.
Information so designated and produced by third parties shall thereafter be treated by the parties
in the same manner as if produced with such designation by a party. A producing non-party shall
have all the rights of a producing party with respect to protection of information under the terms
of this Order. The provisions of this Order for challenging the designation by a party are
applicable to challenges to designations by non-parties.
13.
Prior to disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” information to any third parties described in paragraph 5(d) – (f)
above, counsel for the party seeking disclosure shall require such persons to read this Order and
execute a Nondisclosure Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, a copy of which
shall be promptly provided to opposing counsel and served on all other counsel of record. In
addition, counsel for the party seeking disclosure shall comply with the following:
(a)
Ten days prior to disclosure to any third party, Counsel for the party
seeking disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS
EYES ONLY” information, shall provide, subject to subparagraphs 13 (b-e) to opposing counsel
and to any non-party from which the material originated, if applicable, the name, address, and
present employer of such outside consultant or expert, translator or interpreter. Opposing counsel
and/or such non-party shall then have a period of ten business (10) days after receipt of such
information to challenge the disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” information to such person in this action, by serving a written
statement of the challenge upon the party seeking to make such disclosure.
(b)
Any challenge shall be ruled on by the Court prior to disclosure of any
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” information.
(c)
Nothing in this Paragraph shall be deemed to enlarge or restrict the right
of any party to conduct discovery of any expert.
(d)
Nothing in this Order shall be construed as requiring: i) that routine outside
suppliers of litigation support services such as photocopying, scanning, or coding execute the
attached Nondisclosure Agreement; or ii) that the opposing party utilizing such services must
disclose the identity of such service suppliers to the opposing party or counsel.
(e)
Nothing in this Order shall be construed as requiring that the identity of
graphics preparation and presentation consultants, witness preparation consultants, jury
consultants, or trial presentation consultants be disclosed to the opposing party or counsel.
However, any party utilizing such services is required to have such proposed service provider
conduct a conflict check and execute the attached Nondisclosure Agreement.
14.
Nothing in this Order shall prevent or restrict any person from using or disclosing
in any manner its own “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS
EYES ONLY” information that it has produced or disclosed in this litigation.
15.
Nothing in this Order shall prevent disclosure beyond the terms of this Order of
any “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY”
information if the parties to this action and, if applicable, the non-party from which the material
originated, consent, or if the Court, on motion filed by the party seeking to make disclosure,
orders that disclosure be made. Any party may at any time request the Court, after notice to the
opposing party and to the non-party from which the material originated, if applicable, to modify
or grant relief from any provision of this Order or to place additional restrictions on the use of
any “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY”
information.
16.
Information disclosed at a deposition may be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” by indicating on the record at the
deposition that the information is “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” and is subject to the provisions of this Order. All such portions of
the transcript shall be appropriately marked by the court reporter and shall be treated by the
parties as set forth
herein. Testimony in a deposition may also be designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” by notifying
the deposing party in writing within ten (10) business days of the receipt of the transcript of
those pages and lines or those exhibits that are “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY,” as the case may be. No deposition may be
read by anyone other than the deponent, the attorneys for the parties, and those qualified to see
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” material under Paragraph 7 during
the twenty-one (21) day period following a deposition unless otherwise agreed upon among the
attorneys.
Upon being informed that certain portions of a deposition disclose either
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS
EYES
ONLY”
information, each party must cause each copy of the transcript in its custody or control to be
marked immediately.
17.
Violation by any person of any term of this Order or of the Nondisclosure
Agreement may be punishable as contempt of court. Any person or entity that produces
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” information
in response to a discovery request or subpoena in this action is intended to be a beneficiary of
this Order and of the Nondisclosure Agreement and may pursue all remedies available for
violation thereof. No provision of this Order shall be deemed to require any person or entity not
a party to this action to respond to any discovery request or subpoena, except as may otherwise
be required by law. Nothing in this Order shall prevent or prohibit any party or non-party from
seeking such additional or further protection as it deems necessary to protect documents or
information subject to discovery in this action.
18.
Nothing herein and no action taken under this Order shall constitute a waiver or
admission that any specific document, material, testimony, or thing: (1) is relevant and subject to
discovery; (2) is or is not a trade secret or confidential proprietary information; (3) constitutes or
does not constitute confidential records; or (4) is or is not admissible in evidence at trial or at any
hearing. The production of any documents or information that the producing party claims to be
privileged shall be governed by the facts and applicable law.
19.
Upon the final termination of this litigation, including any appeals, the parties
have sixty (60) days within which they may petition the Clerk of Court to return to the party
which filed them all “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES
ONLY” information, and documents and things containing “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” information, that have been filed under seal
with the Court. Any and all originals and copies of Discovery Materials designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” shall, at the
request of the producing party, be returned to the party within sixty (60) days after a final
judgment herein or settlement of this action, or, at the option of the producing party, destroyed in
that time frame, except that Outside Counsel for each party may maintain in its files one copy of
each pleading filed with the Court, each deposition transcript together with the exhibits marked
at the deposition, and documents constituting work product which were internally generated
based upon or which include “CONFIDENTIAL” information or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY” information. Upon receipt of any subpoena for such information,
the party receiving the subpoena shall immediately notify Outside Counsel for the producing
party of the subpoena so that the latter may protect its interests. In the event that documents are
returned to or destroyed at the request of the producing party, the other party or its Outside
Counsel shall certify in writing that all such documents have been returned or destroyed, as the
case may be. The parties should agree to reasonable extensions of time to complete the return of
the “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY”
information, if necessary.
20.
The restrictions set forth in any of the preceding paragraphs of this Order shall not
apply to information that:
(a)
Was, is, or becomes public knowledge or publicly accessible not in
violation of this Order; or
(b)
this Order.
Was lawfully possessed by the non-designating party prior to the date of
21.
This Order shall continue in full force and effect after the termination of this
litigation, including all appeals, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction necessary to enforce the
terms of this Order. However, this Order shall be subject to revocation or modification by order
of the Court, upon written stipulation of the parties, or upon motion and reasonable notice,
including opportunity for a hearing and presentation of evidence should the Court so decide.
22.
The parties agree to submit this Order for entry by the Court and to be bound by
the terms prior to entry by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 21, 2016
EXHIBIT A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATESVILLE DIVISION
CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-143-RLV-DCK
Richey Brothers Trucking, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
West Coast Distributing, Inc. and
Leonard’s Express, Inc.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
UNDER CONSENT PROTECTIVE
ORDER
The undersigned, having read the Consent Protective Order (the “Protective Order”)
entered in this action, understands the terms thereof, and intending to be legally bound thereby,
agrees as follows:
1.
All information and documents disclosed to the undersigned pursuant to the
Protective Order shall be used only in connection with the above-captioned action (the
“Litigation”) and shall not be used for any business or other purpose.
2.
Such information and documents shall be disclosed to and discussed only with the
parties' outside counsel and other persons so authorized pursuant to the terms of the Protective
Order, who have in accordance with the provisions of the Protective Order executed a similar
Nondisclosure Agreement. Neither such documents or information nor information acquired or
extracted from such documents or information will be divulged or made accessible to any other
person, company, firm, news organization, or any other person or entity whatsoever, except in
compliance with the Protective Order and this Nondisclosure Agreement. This Nondisclosure
Agreement does not limit the right of the signatory to testify at trial in this action or to prepare
documents or other materials for submission at trial in this action.
3.
The undersigned agrees to take all appropriate and necessary precautions to avoid
loss or inadvertent disclosure of documents or information covered by the Protective Order.
4.
The undersigned further agrees to return all information and documents in his or
her possession or control (including all abstracts, summaries, descriptions, lists, synopses,
pleadings, or other writings reflecting or revealing such information) and covered by the
Protective Order, to the attorney from whom he or she received such documents and information
within thirty (30) days after the termination of this Litigation, including all appeals, or within
thirty (30) days after the undersigned is no longer associated with this Litigation, whichever comes
first.
5.
The undersigned acknowledges that a violation of the terms of the Protective
Order may subject the undersigned and/or his/her employer to sanctions, including, but not
limited to, punishment for civil contempt.
Dated:
Signature
Printed Name
Address
Employer(s)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?